skip to main content
10.1145/3158191.3158207acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseooltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Traceability and impact analysis in requirement verification

Published:01 December 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Seamless tracing of the requirements and associating them with the models and the simulation results is becoming increasingly important. This can be used to support several activities such as variant handling, impact analysis, component reuse, verification, and validation. This work in progress paper presents an approach for combining traceability with requirement verification in Modelica. Traceability is supported via the OSLC specification standard combined with Git version control system. All operations on artifacts of interest are traced. Currently, the traceability data is stored in a graph database which can be queried for generating various reports such as impact analysis, variant handling, etc.

References

  1. Lena Buffoni and Peter Fritzson. 2014. Expressing Requirements in Modelica. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfredo Garro, Andrea Tundis, Daniel Bouskela, Audrey Jardin, Nguyen Thuy, Martin Otter, Lena Buffoni, Peter Fritzson, Martin SjÃűlund, Wladimir Schamai, and Hans Olsson. 2016. On formal cyber physical system properties modeling: A new temporal logic language and a Modelica-based solution. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alachew Mengist, Adrian Pop, Adeel Asghar, and Peter Fritzson. 2017. Traceability Support in OpenModelica Using Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC). In Proceedings of the 12th International Modelica Conference. Modelica Association and Linköping University Electronic Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Martin Otter, Nguyen Thuy, Daniel Bouskela, Lena Buffoni, Hilding Elmqvist, Peter Fritzson, Alfredo Garro, Audrey Jardin, Hans Olsson, Maxime Payelleville, Wladimir Schamai, Eric Thomas, and Andrea Tundis. 2015. Formal Requirements Modeling for Simulation-Based Verification. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wladimir Schamai. 2013. Model-Based Verification of Dynamic System Behavior against Requirements.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wladimir Schamai, Lena Buffoni, Nicolas Albarello, Pablo Fontes De Miranda, and Peter Fritzson. 2015. An Aeronautic Case Study for Requirement Formalization and Automated Model Composition in Modelica. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Traceability and impact analysis in requirement verification

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EOOLT '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Equation-Based Object-Oriented Modeling Languages and Tools
        December 2017
        95 pages
        ISBN:9781450363730
        DOI:10.1145/3158191
        • General Chair:
        • Dirk Zimmer,
        • Program Chair:
        • Bernhard Bachmann

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate10of11submissions,91%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader